US Men's Grand Slam Dry Spell Is Not Taylor Fritz's Burden to Bear
I have some opinions about that comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.
Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose Fritz had beaten the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions on the brain?
Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing between her and consistent victories
Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite serve and concussive strength on each forehand and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, though, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his potential.
Fritz has made a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of American men lifting grand slams when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.
Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.
Fritz’s performance in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much effort to win it. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.
The contest was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.
The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)
Year-End Championships: Singles Groups
Jimmy Connors Group
- Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
- Taylor Fritz (US)
- The Australian speedster
- Lorenzo Musetti (It)
Bjorn Borg Group
- Jannik Sinner (It)
- The German powerhouse
- The rising American
- Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)
“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz told a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {