I'm a Committed Free-Market Advocate, But Universal Medicare Represents the Best Hope for US Health System

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.

Antonio Payne
Antonio Payne

A lifestyle writer passionate about wellness trends and creative living, sharing insights to inspire everyday joy.