🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove Black history and narrative from the records is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how little it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the threats that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.